Thursday, March 31, 2011
Music Lockers Are DoA, But Maybe That's Besides The Point
It's hard to see how music lockers like Amazon's have much of a future, at least at the moment. As wireless carriers try hard to cut back bandwidth consumption, streaming music seems like one of the first places that consumers will forgo. After all, most smartphones today can carry your whole music collection easily for most consumers. And for those who do want streaming music, services like Pandora are much less hassle and basically free.
So what's the point? It may just be to push the envelope in the industry, opening up the way for a much broader licensing model and forcing the RIAA into a more rational approach.
So what's the point? It may just be to push the envelope in the industry, opening up the way for a much broader licensing model and forcing the RIAA into a more rational approach.
Your vault, in the cloud (but lighter). Photo by Ostograd. |
Wednesday, March 30, 2011
Two years old from the Economist, but prescient on today's Japan-based SCM crisis. http://ping.fm/g5SB0
Back To The Blackberry And Not Unhappy About It
In the last 9 months, I've done the full tour of mobile phone operating systems and carriers. And now, with a new job that requires a Blackberry, I'm back just about exactly where I started. My full tour of smartphones has included:
- An iPhone4 on AT&T, which was amazing in a number of different ways. Slim, beautiful, and solidly crafted, the iPhone 4 was easily the nicest phone I've ever owned from a physical design standpoint. Layer on top of that the single best operating system and app environment on the market and you get something truly great.
- A Motorola Droid 2 Global. Ugh. Awful. Android works well, but lacks the polish of the iOS. Motorola's Droid 2 Global was large, plasticky, and the battery lasted even less than the iPhone - much less than the iPhone.
- A Motorola Defy. Nice. Rugged Android with good battery life. Sluggish, however, due to a weak CPU.
- A Nexus S. Fast with a great display, but still unable to shake the plastic feel. Nothing quite gets you back to the iPhone experience. And crippled by T-Mobile's network.
- Fast typing. Email is the heart of my business. That means typing out messages.
- Fast everything. The Blackberry OS is one of the snappier and more responsive operating systems.
- Best-In-Class PIM functionality. The core PIM functions on a Blackberry, which represent 90% of the smart in smartphone for business users remain the best in the business.
Back to the keyboard. Photo by sk8geek |
Tuesday, March 29, 2011
The Emerging Commerce Cloud
"Cloud" has become a generic designation for all services that take place somewhere online, but most of the initial cloud services have been quite basic: storage and CPU power, for example. As time goes by, however, cloud services are become more and more specialized and driven by business requirements rather than technology capability.
One new broad set of cloud services that is emerging are commerce services. Everything needed to build, manage, maintain and optimize and online sales presence is now available without having to buy application software. And while basic services have long been available to small businesses (think of eBay as the first commerce cloud service) these are now becoming industrial strength and enable substantial customization.
In addition to the core capabilities around selling, the commerce cloud that's emerging now includes a huge range of specialized services including business analytics and optimization. a good example of this is Upstream Commerce, which helps companies optimize the pricing of their products. Historically, pricing management and optimization was a very specialized skill, now it's available as a web service.
It's not year clear what the pricing is for solutions like this, but it's the ability to assemble an integrated online sales environment, complete with analytics is shifting from a million dollar+ investment down to a monthly service fee.
One new broad set of cloud services that is emerging are commerce services. Everything needed to build, manage, maintain and optimize and online sales presence is now available without having to buy application software. And while basic services have long been available to small businesses (think of eBay as the first commerce cloud service) these are now becoming industrial strength and enable substantial customization.
In addition to the core capabilities around selling, the commerce cloud that's emerging now includes a huge range of specialized services including business analytics and optimization. a good example of this is Upstream Commerce, which helps companies optimize the pricing of their products. Historically, pricing management and optimization was a very specialized skill, now it's available as a web service.
Instant Visibility to Pricing Competition - Form the Upstream Website |
It's not year clear what the pricing is for solutions like this, but it's the ability to assemble an integrated online sales environment, complete with analytics is shifting from a million dollar+ investment down to a monthly service fee.
Wednesday, March 23, 2011
I love those crazy people at BoingBoing. Sometimes it's just better to laugh at BigContent than reason with it. http://ping.fm/khNDc
How To Offend Your Customers: Threaten Them
In the US, your credit rating is very important to consumers. People with good credit can borrow to homes and cars, those without cannot do so except at exorbitant rates, if at all. Increasingly, companies have been quick to deny credit and cut off service, even to customers with fairly good track records.
And now there's a new game in town: threatening customers before they've even missed a payment. I know because it's happened to me twice in the last week. First, I got a threatening letter from my mortgage company. They told me I was delinquent on my mortgage payment and threatened me with dire consequences if I failed to pay immediately.
Panic ensued. How could I be late on a mortgage that was just re-financed? I had provided automatic payment information when I completed the re-finance. Indeed, after a few phone calls, it turned out that I was not delinquent at all. The mortgage company's systems, seeing no record of past payments, decided to send me an automated threatening letter, oblivious to the fact that new mortgages have no payment record.
Isolated incident? I would have thought so except that three days later, Verizon interrupted a phone call to inform me that unless I paid immediately, I would be cut off as my bill was delinquent. How was that possible when they had my credit card and I had authorized automatic payment? Apparently it takes 30 days for them to realize that they have my credit card.
In both cases, attempts by the bank and Verizon to collect on non-delinquent accounts used the kind of language that I'd normally expect for someone who's months overdue and has lied twice about "the check being in the mail." Threatening people like this is a great way to alienate customers and damage your brand.
And now there's a new game in town: threatening customers before they've even missed a payment. I know because it's happened to me twice in the last week. First, I got a threatening letter from my mortgage company. They told me I was delinquent on my mortgage payment and threatened me with dire consequences if I failed to pay immediately.
Panic ensued. How could I be late on a mortgage that was just re-financed? I had provided automatic payment information when I completed the re-finance. Indeed, after a few phone calls, it turned out that I was not delinquent at all. The mortgage company's systems, seeing no record of past payments, decided to send me an automated threatening letter, oblivious to the fact that new mortgages have no payment record.
Isolated incident? I would have thought so except that three days later, Verizon interrupted a phone call to inform me that unless I paid immediately, I would be cut off as my bill was delinquent. How was that possible when they had my credit card and I had authorized automatic payment? Apparently it takes 30 days for them to realize that they have my credit card.
In both cases, attempts by the bank and Verizon to collect on non-delinquent accounts used the kind of language that I'd normally expect for someone who's months overdue and has lied twice about "the check being in the mail." Threatening people like this is a great way to alienate customers and damage your brand.
Shoot First and Ask Questions Later. It's the new way to do business. Photo by Rob Sameehan. |
Starving Netflix of content will not kill them - just accelerate their rise as an original producer. http://ping.fm/63UhO
Bag-O-Flage
The art of concealing your carry on luggage using blankets and pillows to avoid having it stowed in the overhead bin when seated at the exit row.
You're not supposed to have any bags here...but... Photo by GlobalX |
Tuesday, March 22, 2011
Are We Getting Any Smarter About Risk?
There's lots of data out there that shows that human beings are bad at assessing risks - particularly ones that are infrequent but potentially devastating. Economists and insurance companies can take a stab at it, but even they cannot fully understand the likelihood of catastrophe for extremely rare events.
That said, we do know that some things are risky. Like earthquakes. Yet despite the large number of earth quakes that happen every year and the clear pronouncements about the risk, few people actually buy earthquake insurance.
Will the ubiquitous digital camera on a cell-phone change this? Thanks to cell phones and digital cameras, we're over-run with imagery from the earthquake and tsunami in Japan. For the first time in my life, I got to see what "Liquefaction" really is (check this out). Another video shows an entire harbor being washed away by the Tsunami.
End result? Perhaps people will get smarter about buying insurance for disasters. But you should never underestimate the stupidity of the human race.
That said, we do know that some things are risky. Like earthquakes. Yet despite the large number of earth quakes that happen every year and the clear pronouncements about the risk, few people actually buy earthquake insurance.
Will the ubiquitous digital camera on a cell-phone change this? Thanks to cell phones and digital cameras, we're over-run with imagery from the earthquake and tsunami in Japan. For the first time in my life, I got to see what "Liquefaction" really is (check this out). Another video shows an entire harbor being washed away by the Tsunami.
End result? Perhaps people will get smarter about buying insurance for disasters. But you should never underestimate the stupidity of the human race.
Monday, March 21, 2011
Will AT&T's T-Mobile Buy-Out Get Approval?
There's little doubt among wireless customers that this is a merger that will be bad for business. Already, competition between the two major US wireless operators seems to be squeezing out secondary players like Sprint and T-Mobile.
Tith T-Mobile out of the way, the US will have just one GSM operator, AT&T, and one major CDMA operator committed to LTE, and two minor CDMA operators, one of which is committed to LTE and one of which is not really sure what it's doing (Sprint).
The result for consumers: a nightmare of non-inter-operable handsets and long contracts with high prices and bad service. Over the last few years, the phone-y marketing battle between AT&T and Verizon has reached a fever pitch, but actual investment in new cell sites and bigger backhaul has been relatively slow. And both companies have worked hard at throttling back "unlimited" data plans.
The result: prices are flat in the US while they're falling everywhere else. GigaOm has a great article on how market concentration is damaging our competitiveness, and hopefully the DoJ will work to block the merger. Link.
If the DoJ doesn't block the merger, it could extract a set of concessions that might be be enough to increase competition in the market. The GigaOm article talks about deals with rural carriers, but the biggest thing that the DoJ could do would be to strengthen Sprint and improve the prospects for MetroPCS as a truly national discounter.
Tith T-Mobile out of the way, the US will have just one GSM operator, AT&T, and one major CDMA operator committed to LTE, and two minor CDMA operators, one of which is committed to LTE and one of which is not really sure what it's doing (Sprint).
The result for consumers: a nightmare of non-inter-operable handsets and long contracts with high prices and bad service. Over the last few years, the phone-y marketing battle between AT&T and Verizon has reached a fever pitch, but actual investment in new cell sites and bigger backhaul has been relatively slow. And both companies have worked hard at throttling back "unlimited" data plans.
The result: prices are flat in the US while they're falling everywhere else. GigaOm has a great article on how market concentration is damaging our competitiveness, and hopefully the DoJ will work to block the merger. Link.
If the DoJ doesn't block the merger, it could extract a set of concessions that might be be enough to increase competition in the market. The GigaOm article talks about deals with rural carriers, but the biggest thing that the DoJ could do would be to strengthen Sprint and improve the prospects for MetroPCS as a truly national discounter.
Market concentration is leading to reduced CapEx and more marketing. Photo by Smith. |
Thursday, March 17, 2011
Business Models for Web Properties & Cable TV Channels Are Converging
HBO started as a premium movie channel but eventually, it moved into the business of making original content. And while today HBO's schedule still has a lot of movies on it, many people buy subscriptions for access the network's critically acclaimed original series.
HBO's model has been coped by more and more cable channels, including AMC, which had it's breakout original series Mad Men. Now Netflix is doing the same thing. Unable to buy fresh content at reasonable prices, Netflix has reached a size and scale that allows it to start making original productions.
Netflix will not be the last web player to do this either. Others such as Hulu or LoveFilm and Amazon may need to start building their own primetime schedules. Traditional broadcast and cable networks are trying hard to keep the "contagion" of Internet TV from spreading. Withholding top series and fresh content are a key part of that strategy.
But Hollywood is not monolithic. Buyers with money can always get good content made. That said, Hollywood is full of smart money and there's a long history of people making small fortunes out of big ones in Hollywood. Don't be surprised if Netflix gets burned a few times before it gets the model right.
HBO's model has been coped by more and more cable channels, including AMC, which had it's breakout original series Mad Men. Now Netflix is doing the same thing. Unable to buy fresh content at reasonable prices, Netflix has reached a size and scale that allows it to start making original productions.
Netflix will not be the last web player to do this either. Others such as Hulu or LoveFilm and Amazon may need to start building their own primetime schedules. Traditional broadcast and cable networks are trying hard to keep the "contagion" of Internet TV from spreading. Withholding top series and fresh content are a key part of that strategy.
But Hollywood is not monolithic. Buyers with money can always get good content made. That said, Hollywood is full of smart money and there's a long history of people making small fortunes out of big ones in Hollywood. Don't be surprised if Netflix gets burned a few times before it gets the model right.
Online productions get bigger and competitive. Photo from Wikimedia. |
Wednesday, March 16, 2011
Little Demand for Verizon iPads
In the multi-billion dollar marketing war between AT&T and Verizon, one fact that many people are not aware of is that Verizon's 3G data network is not so great. And while every iPad sold out on launch day, some Q&A with Apple employees in the line and at the store told me that demand for Verizon's iPad was "reluctant" and "they'll take it if that's their only 3G choice."
In general, WiFi-only 16 and 32GB iPads remain the core of the business, but for people who are buying 3G, most are opting for the AT&T choice, with HSPA and global roaming.
In general, WiFi-only 16 and 32GB iPads remain the core of the business, but for people who are buying 3G, most are opting for the AT&T choice, with HSPA and global roaming.
Satellite Broadband Could Reshape The Global Infrastructure Game
Satellite broadband has long been considered somewhat useless. Both my mother and my mother-in-law have or had it at their places and it was painfully slow to use. Like dial-up slow. (Technically, it's broadband, but only just. How quickly we forget how slow dial-up really was.)
That's set to change with a new generation of satellites that will deliver up to 400 gigabits of bandwidth from each satellite. That's enough for over 40,000 simultaneous 10MB downlink connections. This should support up to 500,000 or more broadband users. And this is from a relatively small satellite. Bigger satellites and networks of multiple satellites are under construction.
In the past, these services have been slow and expensive, limiting them to emergency usage and remote access for users with critical business needs and deep pockets. The next generation will offer competitively priced access in a huge range of global markets, and much of it without the need for a big antenna that requires professional installation.
There's no way that satellite broadband will replace ground-based broadband for urban users. For a significant share of the market, however, that may not be necessary. Rural users and less intensive suburban users may find the price and availability competitive. And that could force ground-based operators to competitive upgrade their service in order to maintain a better level of differentiation.
That's set to change with a new generation of satellites that will deliver up to 400 gigabits of bandwidth from each satellite. That's enough for over 40,000 simultaneous 10MB downlink connections. This should support up to 500,000 or more broadband users. And this is from a relatively small satellite. Bigger satellites and networks of multiple satellites are under construction.
In the past, these services have been slow and expensive, limiting them to emergency usage and remote access for users with critical business needs and deep pockets. The next generation will offer competitively priced access in a huge range of global markets, and much of it without the need for a big antenna that requires professional installation.
There's no way that satellite broadband will replace ground-based broadband for urban users. For a significant share of the market, however, that may not be necessary. Rural users and less intensive suburban users may find the price and availability competitive. And that could force ground-based operators to competitive upgrade their service in order to maintain a better level of differentiation.
Tuesday, March 15, 2011
Amazing, thoughtful analysis of the impact of new technologies like 3D printing on the law and regulation. http://ping.fm/Znise
Did Apple Rush the iPad 2 Launch?
It's hard to escape the idea that Apple rushed the iPad 2 launch. After waiting in line for 3 hours on Friday, there were barely any iPads left by the time I got to the front of the line. I wanted an White AT&T iPad, but ended up with a black one instead.
By all accounts, the lines for the iPad 2 were not any heavier than for the original or the iPhone 4, yet Apple seemed to have far fewer devices on hand than at those launches, with many people in the line being turned away and told that there won't be any left for them by the time they get to the front of the line.
Apple's web site is now quoting 3-4 weeks on delivery time for the iPad 2 - and that's after just 3 days of sales. Signs suggest that either Apple underestimated demand for the iPad 2 (unlikely) or that they launched with far less inventory than they would have liked to - and if so - why?
There's a whole Kremlinology built up on reading the tea leaves from Apple, so I'll avoid any conspiracy theories and just leave it at this: it seems like this was not the smoothest of launch events for Apple.
By all accounts, the lines for the iPad 2 were not any heavier than for the original or the iPhone 4, yet Apple seemed to have far fewer devices on hand than at those launches, with many people in the line being turned away and told that there won't be any left for them by the time they get to the front of the line.
Apple's web site is now quoting 3-4 weeks on delivery time for the iPad 2 - and that's after just 3 days of sales. Signs suggest that either Apple underestimated demand for the iPad 2 (unlikely) or that they launched with far less inventory than they would have liked to - and if so - why?
There's a whole Kremlinology built up on reading the tea leaves from Apple, so I'll avoid any conspiracy theories and just leave it at this: it seems like this was not the smoothest of launch events for Apple.
Launch lines were long and full of disappointed people. Photo by Brandon Flasch |
Monday, March 14, 2011
That Bitter Taste In My Mouth Is Mint.com
Over the last few months I've gotten a taste of what happens when you get something for free and the company that manages that free service doesn't do a good job: no recourse. I've entrusted my financial data to Mint.com for two years now, but for the last several months, it's become difficult, if not impossible, to get proper updates on transactions, particularly the ones from American Express.
Mint.com's forums are filled with hundreds of complaints on this topic, but there's been no fix. And as people enjoying a free service, we have no recourse for complaint. And while Quicken has recently purchased Mint and there may be hope for the future (common back end for integration to banks) in the meantime, free might just be too cheap for mission-critical.
That's not always true. Google, Microsoft, and Yahoo all operate e-mail services that every bit as reliable as any corporate or paid system I have ever used, but they operate in a fiercely competitive market and have backing from very advanced technology. The same cannot be said, it seems, for online financial planning.
Mint.com's forums are filled with hundreds of complaints on this topic, but there's been no fix. And as people enjoying a free service, we have no recourse for complaint. And while Quicken has recently purchased Mint and there may be hope for the future (common back end for integration to banks) in the meantime, free might just be too cheap for mission-critical.
That's not always true. Google, Microsoft, and Yahoo all operate e-mail services that every bit as reliable as any corporate or paid system I have ever used, but they operate in a fiercely competitive market and have backing from very advanced technology. The same cannot be said, it seems, for online financial planning.
The online variety leaves a bad aftertaste. Photo by Steven DePolo |
Friday, March 11, 2011
Thursday, March 10, 2011
The Top 10 Lies Flight Attendants Tell You
1. Welcome Aboard
2. It’s a federal requirement that you….[insert here]
It may or may not be. Chances are your flight attendant is making up the rules as he or she goes, some of the them amazingly absurd.
3. There are still some phones turned on. We can’t leave the gate until all phones are switched off.
You can fool some of the people some of the time, but give up on that when flying to/from silicon valley. We know better.
4. Flight attendants are here primarily for your safety.
Translation: we're embarrassed that our job is "serving" people and we're not proud of what we do.
5. Use of cellular phones on board may interfere with the navigation systems on the airplane.
See #3 above.
6. I’ll be right back with that…
I've been waiting for one can of soda since 1987.
7. We're all out of the [insert entrée here]
Actually, we're holding that one back for our own lunch.
8. We just need a few minutes of your undivided attention.
You've seen this video 500 times.
9. If there’s anything we can do to make your trip more comfortable, please don’t hesitate to call on us.
Use the attendant call button at your own risk.10. Thank you for your business. It’s been our pleasure serving you today.
We've hidden in the galley as long as we could and we asked the captain to keep the seat belt sign on most of the time so you can't bother us. Thank goodness this flight with you people is over.
And we cooked this at home just for you. Picture by 737700 |
Apple's app store rules are indeed starting to accelerate HTML5 "apps". Readability is the first. http://ping.fm/ve4xz
Wednesday, March 09, 2011
The High-Low Effect Comes to Big Content
Joe Kennedy famously said that he knew it was time to get out of the stock market when he started getting stock tips from the shoeshine boy. Eighty years later, I know that "cable cutting" (ditching your costly cable subscription for over the top video) is real because I just got suggestions on how to do it this week from a blue-collar, middle-aged New Jersey Transit bus driver.
My bus driver (Route 167, if you care) explained to me how he has his Netflix connected to this Toshiba plasma TV through his playstation. And so cable cutting is as real as it gets and Comcast should be worried. More importantly, Hollywood should be worried about the High-Low effect.
For many years now, Hollywood has worked hard to define a set of complex release windows where content gets progressively cheaper as time goes by. If you step back from it, it's no so unlike the world of retail. New products arrive first at top end boutiques and then through mid-range department stores and finally at Wal-Mart.
Over the last thirty years, high end boutiques and Wal-Mart have thrived. Department stores have been slaughtered as consumers choose to go high or low depending on what they value and their mood. And so we face the concept with entertainment.
People are still going to the movies in the theatre, indeed, theatre revenue has been remarkably robust given the rising prices. And they are adding Netflix online services in droves. What they are starting to abandon is the middle ground: pricey cable subscriptions that given them "inbetween" access to content.
The problem for Hollywood is that they are still largely depending on the "department store" of cable to provide the bulk of content revenue and have worked hard to slow the growth of discount online services like Netflix. It's not working, but they are training a generation of users to not care anymore about release dates and just watch what Netflix recommends. Great for Netflix, bad for movie studios.
My bus driver (Route 167, if you care) explained to me how he has his Netflix connected to this Toshiba plasma TV through his playstation. And so cable cutting is as real as it gets and Comcast should be worried. More importantly, Hollywood should be worried about the High-Low effect.
For many years now, Hollywood has worked hard to define a set of complex release windows where content gets progressively cheaper as time goes by. If you step back from it, it's no so unlike the world of retail. New products arrive first at top end boutiques and then through mid-range department stores and finally at Wal-Mart.
Over the last thirty years, high end boutiques and Wal-Mart have thrived. Department stores have been slaughtered as consumers choose to go high or low depending on what they value and their mood. And so we face the concept with entertainment.
People are still going to the movies in the theatre, indeed, theatre revenue has been remarkably robust given the rising prices. And they are adding Netflix online services in droves. What they are starting to abandon is the middle ground: pricey cable subscriptions that given them "inbetween" access to content.
The problem for Hollywood is that they are still largely depending on the "department store" of cable to provide the bulk of content revenue and have worked hard to slow the growth of discount online services like Netflix. It's not working, but they are training a generation of users to not care anymore about release dates and just watch what Netflix recommends. Great for Netflix, bad for movie studios.
Theatres are like boutiques for content - expensive and (they hope) worth-it. |
Tuesday, March 08, 2011
NYTimes InfoGraphic Shows Best Seller List Determined By A Small Number of Readers
This nifty New York Times info-graphic (link for the full one) shows two important things:
- The switch from paper to eBooks has happened with terrifying speed. The best-seller list is dominated by eBooks.
- Since Amazon has something like 95% of the eBook market in the US, and they've sold only a few million of the devices, it implies that something like 2-3% of the US population is what really drives the best-seller list.
New York Times Best-Seller List - in Paper & eBook Share. (Big Chart Link) |
Monday, March 07, 2011
iPad 2 A Bit Disappointing, But Apple's Share of Tablet Business Unlikely To Erode Quickly
There's an automatic assumption out there in the market that Apple's share of the tablet PC market will erode in about the same manner that it's share of the iPhone has eroded. That may not turn out to be true because phones and tablets are sold in different ways.
Expensive smart-phones are sold mostly with contracts. That means you can't really tell the difference between the cost of an iPhone and the cost of an Android phone. Carriers tend to sell most of these phones at fairly similar (highly subsidized) prices, and Apple charges a premium to carriers for its iPhone.
Tablets are a different ball-game. They are sold mostly without subsidies and in this market, we are able to see that competitors are having a hard time beating Apple's cost structure. Motorola's XOOM tablet is basically competitive (a 10% premium for the free 4G upgrade is quite reasonable) but only at the higher end. Nobody has cracked the $499 price point yet and that's where Apple continues to sell the majority of the iPads - WiFi only products.
Though the number of tablet apps in this space is limited on Android, that will improve. However, to really dent Apple's market share in this space, companies are going to have to start beating Apple on price with competitively spec'd products. That doesn't appear to be happening this year, though perhaps we'll see some aggressive moves in 2012.
Expensive smart-phones are sold mostly with contracts. That means you can't really tell the difference between the cost of an iPhone and the cost of an Android phone. Carriers tend to sell most of these phones at fairly similar (highly subsidized) prices, and Apple charges a premium to carriers for its iPhone.
Tablets are a different ball-game. They are sold mostly without subsidies and in this market, we are able to see that competitors are having a hard time beating Apple's cost structure. Motorola's XOOM tablet is basically competitive (a 10% premium for the free 4G upgrade is quite reasonable) but only at the higher end. Nobody has cracked the $499 price point yet and that's where Apple continues to sell the majority of the iPads - WiFi only products.
Though the number of tablet apps in this space is limited on Android, that will improve. However, to really dent Apple's market share in this space, companies are going to have to start beating Apple on price with competitively spec'd products. That doesn't appear to be happening this year, though perhaps we'll see some aggressive moves in 2012.
And still the same price. |
Saturday, March 05, 2011
Friday, March 04, 2011
How To Roam Cheaply With Your Smartphone
Verizon charges $25 per megabyte for overseas data roaming. On an average day, my smartphone consumes about 50 megabytes of data when I am here in the US. That makes going overseas and using your phone a financially ruinous proposition. Even more scary than using a hotel mini-bar. Even with a big data package, you can drop your roaming costs to $1/megabyte, which makes roaming a bargain at $30-50/day.
There is way to get going for much much less money. But it requires preparation and planning. After many years of global travel, here's my recipe for how to survive your trip overseas without coming home with a huge roaming bill.
Step 1: Buy A Package
Step 2: Delete Your Apps
Step 3: Change Your Mail & Messaging Settings
Step 4: Change All Your Other Settings
Step 5: Test It Out
What To Do Before You Take Off. (Picture by Skinny Lawyer) |
There is way to get going for much much less money. But it requires preparation and planning. After many years of global travel, here's my recipe for how to survive your trip overseas without coming home with a huge roaming bill.
Step 1: Buy A Package
- Every carrier offers roaming packages for international travel. They are all incredibly expensive and offer very poor value for money, except when compared to traveling without a package.
- With the most aggressive management of your e-mail and apps, you could get your roaming usage down to 1 MB/day, but don't count on it.
Step 2: Delete Your Apps
- Modern smartphones make it a breeze (mostly) to re-install apps you've purchased, so back up your data and delete as many apps as you can. Decide what you absolutely must have and delete everything else.
- For me, the essentials are e-mail, address book, maps, and calendar.
- The reason to delete everything is that many apps can consume huge amounts of data without your knowledge. Apps can even update themselves, resulting in megabytes of downloads for apps that don't generally use any data at all. Better safe than sorry.
Step 3: Change Your Mail & Messaging Settings
- Mail is a good example: just checking for it uses data. Instead of having "push" email or regular checks, have mail update only manually
- If you can switch off HTML mail or stop the automatic loading of pictures in mail, even better. An e-mail that's text only can use just 1-3 kilobytes ($0.01 in roaming fees) or it can use 3-5 megabytes if it has pictures in it ($75 to $125 in roaming fees).
- On the Blackberry you can go entirely to text e-mail and on the iPhone and others you can just avoid downloading pictures through the mail settings.
Step 4: Change All Your Other Settings
- Once you've pared down your apps to the minimum, go through the settings on all your remaining apps. You've got two objectives: limit when they download data and how much they download.
- Most apps have blocks that let you limit them from downloading except over WiFi or other settings that can help you cut your data consumption or prevent downloads when you're not checking.
Step 5: Test It Out
- Switch off your WiFi and get most of your data over the cellular network for a few days before you travel overseas. (Why switch off your WiFi? If you are using WiFi at home and the office and getting most of your data that way, you may not get a realistic test of how much data you use when away from home)
- Test out your roaming strategy before you go for a few days. Your carrier has data (usually on an 18-24 hour lag) on how much data you use. Log in to their account management web site and see. If your data consumption is still in 10-20mb/day range, you probably missed some apps and settings to limit your data consumption.
And then hit the road. Do these tips work? Let me know.
Thursday, March 03, 2011
Can Verizon Justify A $350 ETF on a $200 Subsidy?
Since 2010 Verizon has raised it's ETF from $200 to $350 for smartphones and devices. That works in the murky world of cell-phone pricing, but can it last the tablet game?
For cell-phones, list prices are relatively irrelevant. Most people buying $500+ cell phones are doing so on a 2 year contract, complete with "subsidy" of $350 or so. Verizon can claim (kinda) that you're just paying them later what you should have paid them sooner.
Not so with tablets. The subsidy in the tablet space is a fairly transparent $200 - so can they really justify a $350 ETF? I think not. Prepare yourself, Verizon, for some lawsuits as the first ETFs are charged to tablet customers.
For cell-phones, list prices are relatively irrelevant. Most people buying $500+ cell phones are doing so on a 2 year contract, complete with "subsidy" of $350 or so. Verizon can claim (kinda) that you're just paying them later what you should have paid them sooner.
Not so with tablets. The subsidy in the tablet space is a fairly transparent $200 - so can they really justify a $350 ETF? I think not. Prepare yourself, Verizon, for some lawsuits as the first ETFs are charged to tablet customers.
Fine Print Shows $350 ETF for a $200 subsidy |
Wednesday, March 02, 2011
More Evidence of Apple's Desktop Share Reaching A Tipping Point
TechCrunch is running a great story looking at the source of their readership over the last four years. As a leading tech blog, they're a good "leading indicator" of how the market is moving. TechCrunch users are probably ahead of the overall curve when it comes to technology adoption, but perhaps not out of the mainstream.
The biggest gains are coming form Apple's least sexy business: the Mac. The TechCrunch article (link) shows that few people are using the iPhone or iPod to browse web-sites. And of course, that's no surprise given the small form factor, it's not much good for intensive reading. The other interesting note is that in just one year, the iPad captured as much as share as it has taken Linux to achieve.
I made the data into a chart so you can see the visual impact, but the full article is over on TechCrunch and it's worth reading.
The biggest gains are coming form Apple's least sexy business: the Mac. The TechCrunch article (link) shows that few people are using the iPhone or iPod to browse web-sites. And of course, that's no surprise given the small form factor, it's not much good for intensive reading. The other interesting note is that in just one year, the iPad captured as much as share as it has taken Linux to achieve.
I made the data into a chart so you can see the visual impact, but the full article is over on TechCrunch and it's worth reading.
Market share by browser O/S for TechCrunch readers. |
Tuesday, March 01, 2011
One Small Step for Google, One Giant Leap for Bing
Search is critical to commerce, but the rise of content farms and all the other kinds of search engine optimization technologies has made it hard for people to differentiate between junk and valuable sites. Despite all the algorithms that power search engines, people are still much smarter than machines at telling the difference between a content-farmed page or a scam and a real product page.
Both Bing and Google are busy integrating social recommendations - "likes" - into their search results. As time goes on, you'll see search results annotated with information about who likes what in your social network. But the difference between the two is enormous, and for once, Bing has something that Google can't match: integrated data from Facebook.
When it comes to "likes" online, there's Facebook and then there's everything else. Google has tried and repeatedly failed to break into the social networking business. Without 500 million users "liking" stuff on a daily basis, Bing's ability to present socially relevant search results is an order (or orders) of magnitude better than Google.
And because people are so much better than algorithms at picking good sites from bad, this advantage could start to eclipse all of Google's other advantages and put Bing in the leadership position.
Both Bing and Google are busy integrating social recommendations - "likes" - into their search results. As time goes on, you'll see search results annotated with information about who likes what in your social network. But the difference between the two is enormous, and for once, Bing has something that Google can't match: integrated data from Facebook.
When it comes to "likes" online, there's Facebook and then there's everything else. Google has tried and repeatedly failed to break into the social networking business. Without 500 million users "liking" stuff on a daily basis, Bing's ability to present socially relevant search results is an order (or orders) of magnitude better than Google.
And because people are so much better than algorithms at picking good sites from bad, this advantage could start to eclipse all of Google's other advantages and put Bing in the leadership position.
Upper right on Bing: log in using Facebook and get search results that are influenced by your social network. |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)